|
In
the MIX by John
Kreicbergs
July 1, 2002
The
Death of Internet Radio?
CARP?
The RIAA? Royalty rate systems for internet radio?
You
probably don’t care or, even worse, don’t know what’s going on.
Well,
here's a little eye-opener for you: the future of Internet radio
is pretty bleak.
The
Clinton Legacy
It
starts with this: traditional radio sucks. Apart from NPR
and the few remaining independently owned, creatively programmed
aural oases out there, the majority of the AM and FM dial is a vast
wasteland of cookie cutter, crap content stations. Some of you may
not even remember the last time you tuned in to local radio station
for something other than a sports broadcast or the morning traffic
report. In fact, some of you are probably perplexed by the thought
of using that black box in your cars dash for something other playing
CDs and tapes.
The
question as to why it sucks is pretty easily resolved to a two-word
answer: Clear Channel. A corporate
conglomerate that owns nearly 1,200 radio stations nationwide in
247 of the US’s 250 largest markets, Clear Channel was the happy
beneficiary of the 1996 Telecommunications
Act. Signed into law by then-President Clinton, the act all
but did away with many of the restrictions surrounding station ownership,
including the ownership of multiple stations in single markets.
Effectively, the airwaves have been hijacked by this monolithic
entity (but not too monolithic, for the sake of any potential
antitrust talk) that ruthlessly negotiates their use for the sheer
benefit of the music industry’s marketing mavens as well as lining
Clear Channels immense pockets.
Sinister,
isn’t it? And you thought radio sucked just because the teenyboppers
thought boy bands were so dreamy and the guys thought Britney Spears was such
a babe.
Nope.
Behold the power of targeted
marketing. Money talks, kids.
Taking
the Show Online
That
being said, you probably took your quest online,
looking for the next new thing, scouring sites for new artists and
anything else to help escape from the top 40 radio wasteland. With
the proliferation of CD burning technology and broadband Internet
access, music fans were rewarded with a host of new options that
excluded the pain of languishing under the Orwellian control
of America’s airwaves. Any punk with a garage band, a bare bones
recording rig, a CD burner and an Internet-capable computer could
effectively short circuit the traditional control of music distribution.
And before you knew it, these punks found an audience thanks to
the marriage of curious fans with the latest online technology had
to offer: Internet radio.
Like
the offshore pirate
radio stations of the 60s, Internet radio became the voice of
the independent artist, allowing enthusiastic fans and aficionados
to share their eclectic music tastes with anyone around the world.
In the wild, wild west that was the Internet at that time (circa
1996), a working, do-it-yourself alternative was available to the
corporate control of traditional radio. Who could have thought that
indie could be so powerful...and easy?
Boom
Goes Bust
Even
as notoriously slow they were to react, the Recording
Industry Association of America (RIAA) finally did figure out
they were missing the boat. Empowered by the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (DMCA) passed
by Congress in 1998, the RIAA, marching to the tune that they were
just trying to protect the music copyright rights of labels, and
ultimately the artists they represented, began a campaign to figure
out how to rein in control over Internet radio. While traditional
broadcast mediums have only had to pay composers royalties for the
right to broadcast music, the RIAA manage to sway an technologically
ignorant Congress that Internet radio instead amounted to digital
music distribution, since the files being webcasted were, in fact,
"perfect" digital copies and thus entitling artists and
their labels to royalties. Meanwhile, anyone who has actually used
a computer in the last 5 years knows that as a "lossy"
compression format, MP3s, the
preferred format for most Internet radio stations, are still not
a "perfect" digital copy.
For
the sake of space, I’m going forego rehashing the particulars, save
for this link
that pretty much explains the situation. The royalty system proposed
now adopted by the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (as established
by the US Copyright Office)
is unique to entrant radio alone. Furthermore, as the CARP's decision
now stands, the death of Internet radio is imminent, with the first
payment of webcasting royalties (retroactive to 1998, mind you)
due this November. Nevermind the baffling logic that the RIAA is
implementing here: they’re asking webcasters to pay to play (and
hence promote) musical artists. Sorry if I’m confused on this one,
but shouldn’t it be the other way around?
Save
Internet Radio!
Not
to paint too bleak a picture, there are only three real courses
of action. The first is the hope for a successful appeal to the
US District
Court of Appeals in Washington, DC against the CARP's decision.
The
second scenario would require the RIAA and webcasters sitting down
and negotiating a system that would be fair and reasonable to both
parties. Considering that the RIAA still feels slighted
by the fact that the CARP cut the proposed royalty rate in half
(which will still force thousands of online stations to cease their
streams), it seems like two parties that have little if no hope
of meeting in the middle.
The
third involves a close reexamination by Congress of some of the
provisions of the 1998 DMCA to revise that particular bit of legislation
in light of an increased awareness among members of its inherent
flaws. And like any grade-A piece of convoluted American legislation,
this one has some whoppers. Here's where we need
your help. This is your chance to stick it to the man, old-school
style, and it’s going to require not only your attention, but your
action as well. Visit www.saveinternetradio.org,
educate yourself and GET INVOLVED!
The
online radio station you may save could be closer than you think.
|